Pls stroll down for the English version.
多謝各位支持，民主黨團隊的甘乃威終於當選，而泛民亦在港島取得四席！這兩天都心情複雜，我固然因為甘乃威當選而開心（也為自己在黃竹坑選區取得最多票而心感安慰，因為全港只有四個票站有此結果，我以後會再分析。），但同時也為楊森未能連任乃至為民主黨的未來發展而憂心。關於這次競選的感想和分析，我以後會陸續寫出來，下面是今天的雜感，和各位分享。
星期天當晚，我留在黃竹坑點票，留到凌晨三點，然後趕赴九龍灣展覽中心，等候最整個港島的最後點票結果，直到凌晨六點官方宣布甘乃威當選後，我們才放下心頭大石
另一個值得開心的是，何秀蘭女士重返立法會，使泛民在港島取得四席！
我們團隊的楊森博士未能連任，固然與我們以往的支持者轉投其他泛民候選人有關，我們必須就此反省和檢討，以求進步；但楊森提攜後進，使民主黨新生代得以接棒的精神和功勞值得我們尊敬。在整個競選過程中，他全程投入，所付出的時間、精力都遠超我們想像，讓我們深深感動和尊敬。我以前是楊森的助理，我慶幸自己有這麼一位能為我榜樣的"老闆"，也為自己能和他共事及一起競選，感到無上的光榮！我相信甘乃威也有此同感，因為他當選後接受採訪，第一個感謝的就是楊森。
是次選擇結果，我初步認為證實四樣東西(以後再補充)：
一是紮實的地區工作有助羸得選舉，但對比地區工作欠奉但也能高票勝出的公民黨和葉劉淑儀，證明地區工程絕非影響選情最大的因素(他們分別成功取得民主黨和民建聯以前的支持著的信任)；更明顯的例子可看何秀蘭，她是一位被很多市民指責不做地區工作的候選人但仍然勝出。這點是區議會選舉和立法會選舉最大的不同。
二是政黨政治遠未成熟，市民並沒有政黨認同感，選人多於選黨，主要原因同上。
三是中央政府已達到以比例代表制分化在野政治力量，從而強化行政主導的目的。大家可見不僅泛民，連建制派也互相撕殺，混亂程度遠超七國大封相。政黨之間四分五裂，不能團結一致，哪裡能有效發揮立法機關齊心制衡和監察行政權力的角色?
四是民調只能信其大概，但誤差頗大，一到細微處就根本是"垃圾資訊"。
I thank for your support to vote for DP and pan-democrat candidates that made Mr Kam Nai Wai and Ms Cyd Ho elected in HK Island!
I'm unhappy that Dr Yeung Sum was not re-elected, but I respect him very much that he is the one who strongly supports the second tier party member to have more chance to take part in the election. Dr Yeung dedicates himself to this idea and he has been working so hard to help our team and the party as a whole. I'm honored that I was once his assistant and being his teammate to run for this election. It's no wonder Dr Young is the first one Mr Kam thanked when he was asked by the reporter after he was announced elected.
I'd like to share many with you about this election. The following are four points I like like raise:
a. the community work is far not so important in a Legco election like in the district council election;
b. party politics is far not mature in HK, people vote for the person he or she prefers rather than vote for a party;
c. the central gov't gets what it wants: disuniting the non-executive political power successfully by adapting the system of proportional representation, results in that the disunited Legco has little power to check the executive branch and it helps a executive-led gov't;
d. the election survey is for reference only, you can trust the general data but the result is far not accurate.
沒有留言:
張貼留言